scholarly journals Surface Cyclogenesis from Convectively Driven Amplification of Midlevel Mesoscale Convective Vortices

2001 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. 605-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F. Rogers ◽  
J. Michael Fritsch
Keyword(s):  
Mesoscale Convective ◽  
Convective Vortices

Quasi-Stationary, Extreme-Rain-Producing Convective Systems Associated with Midlevel Cyclonic Circulations

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 555-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russ S. Schumacher ◽  
Richard H. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Convective Available Potential Energy ◽  
Extreme Rainfall ◽  
Surface Boundary ◽  
Convective Systems ◽  
Mesoscale Convective ◽  
Weak Boundaries ◽  
Extreme Rain ◽  
Building Behavior ◽  
Slow Moving ◽  
Convective Vortices

Abstract This study identifies and examines the common characteristics of several nocturnal midlatitude mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) that developed near mesoscale convective vortices (MCVs) or cutoff lows. All of these MCSs were organized into convective clusters or lines that exhibited back-building behavior, remained nearly stationary for 6–12 h, and produced locally excessive rainfall (greater than 200 mm in 12 h) that led to substantial flash flooding. Examination of individual events and composite analysis reveals that the MCSs formed in thermodynamic environments characterized by very high relative humidity at low levels, moderate convective available potential energy (CAPE), and very little convective inhibition (CIN). In each case, the presence of a strong low-level jet (LLJ) and weak midlevel winds led to a pronounced reversal of the wind shear vector with height. Most of the MCSs formed without any front or preexisting surface boundary in the vicinity, though weak boundaries were apparent in two of the cases. Lifting and destabilization associated with the interaction between the LLJ and the midlevel circulation assisted in initiating and maintaining the slow-moving MCSs. Based on the cases analyzed in this study and past events described in the literature, a conceptual model of the important processes that lead to extreme rainfall near midlevel circulations is presented.

Mesoscale Convective Vortices in Multiscale, Idealized Simulations: Dependence on Background State, Interdependency with Moist Baroclinic Cyclones, and Comparison with BAMEX Observations

2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (4) ◽  
pp. 1119-1139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Conzemius ◽  
Michael T. Montgomery
Keyword(s):  
Tangential Velocity ◽  
Mesoscale Convective System ◽  
Convective System ◽  
Pressure Amplitude ◽  
Moist Convection ◽  
Convective Systems ◽  
Mesoscale Convective ◽  
Common Center ◽  
Deep Moist Convection ◽  
Convective Vortices

Abstract A set of multiscale, nested, idealized numerical simulations of mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) and mesoscale convective vortices (MCVs) was conducted. The purpose of these simulations was to investigate the dependence of MCV development and evolution on background conditions and to explore the relationship between MCVs and larger, moist baroclinic cyclones. In all experiments, no mesoscale convective system (MCS) developed until a larger-scale, moist baroclinic system with surface pressure amplitude of at least 2 hPa was present. The convective system then enhanced the development of the moist baroclinic system by its diabatic production of eddy available potential energy (APE), which led to the enhanced baroclinic conversion of basic-state APE to eddy APE. The most rapid potential vorticity (PV) development occurred in and just behind the leading convective line. The entire system grew upscale with time as the newly created PV rotated cyclonically around a common center as the leading convective line continued to expand outward. Ten hours after the initiation of deep moist convection, the simulated MCV radii, heights of maximum winds, tangential velocity, and shear corresponded reasonably well to their counterparts in BAMEX. The increasing strength of the simulated MCVs with respect to larger values of background CAPE and shear supports the hypothesis that as long as convection is present, CAPE and shear both add to the strength of the MCV.

scholarly journals The Vertical Structure of Mesoscale Convective Vortices

2009 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 686-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher A. Davis ◽  
Thomas J. Galarneau
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Structure ◽  
Vertical Wind Shear ◽  
Lower Troposphere ◽  
Mesoscale Convective System ◽  
Secondary Phase ◽  
Radical Change ◽  
Convective System ◽  
Mesoscale Convective ◽  
Outflow Boundary ◽  
Convective Vortices

Abstract Simulations of two cases of developing mesoscale convective vortices (MCVs) are examined to determine the dynamics governing the origin and vertical structure of these features. Although one case evolves in strong vertical wind shear and the other evolves in modest shear, the evolutions are remarkably similar. In addition to the well-known mesoscale convergence that spins up vorticity in the midtroposphere, the generation of vorticity in the lower troposphere occurs along the convergent outflow boundary of the parent mesoscale convective system (MCS). Lateral transport of this vorticity from the convective region back beneath the midtropospheric vorticity center is important for obtaining a deep column of cyclonic vorticity. However, this behavior would be only transient without a secondary phase of vorticity growth in the lower troposphere that results from a radical change in the divergence profile favoring lower-tropospheric convergence. Following the decay of the nocturnal MCS, subsequent convection occurs in a condition of greater relative humidity through the lower troposphere and small conditional instability. Vorticity and potential vorticity are efficiently produced near the top of the boundary layer and a cyclonic circulation appears at the surface.

scholarly journals Structure and Motion of Severe-Wind-Producing Mesoscale Convective Systems and Derechos in Relation to the Mean Wind

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 423-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A. Campbell ◽  
Ariel E. Cohen ◽  
Michael C. Coniglio ◽  
Andrew R. Dean ◽  
Stephen F. Corfidi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Convective Systems ◽  
Structure And Motion ◽  
Mesoscale Convective ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Wind Events ◽  
Motion Characteristics ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Convective Vortices

Abstract The goal of this study is to document differences in the convective structure and motion of long-track, severe-wind-producing MCSs from short-track severe-wind-producing MCSs in relation to the mean wind. An ancillary goal is to determine if these differences are large enough that some criterion for MCS motion relative to the mean wind could be used in future definitions of “derechos.” Results confirm past investigations that well-organized MCSs, including those that produce derechos, tend to move faster than the mean wind, exhibiting a significantly larger degree of propagation (component of MCS motion in addition to the component contributed by the mean flow). Furthermore, well-organized systems that produce shorter-track swaths of damaging winds likewise tend to move faster than the mean wind with a significant propagation component along the mean wind. Therefore, propagation in the direction of the mean wind is not necessarily a characteristic that can be used to distinguish derechos from nonderechos. However, there is some indication that long-track damaging wind events that occur without large-scale or persistent bow echoes and mesoscale convective vortices (MCVs) require a strong propagation component along the mean wind direction to become long lived. Overall, however, there does not appear to be enough separation in the motion characteristics among the MCS types to warrant the inclusion of a mean-wind criterion into the definition of a derecho at this time.

scholarly journals Local and Regional Discriminators of Mesoscale Convective Vortex Development in Arizona

2003 ◽  
Vol 131 (8) ◽  
pp. 1939-1943
Author(s):  
David M. Brommer ◽  
Robert C. Balling ◽  
Randall S. Cerveny
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Wind Shear ◽  
Summer Season ◽  
Mesoscale Convective Systems ◽  
Convective Systems ◽  
Central United States ◽  
Mesoscale Convective ◽  
Mesoscale Convective Vortex ◽  
Convective Vortices ◽  
Rawinsonde Data

Abstract In approximately half of Arizona's summer season (June–September) mesoscale convective systems evolve into mesoscale convective vortices (MCVs). Analysis of satellite imagery identified MCVs in Arizona over the period 1991–2000, and local and regional rawinsonde data discriminated conditions conducive for MCV development. These results indicate that MCVs are more likely to form from convective systems when the local and regional environments are characterized by relative stability in the 850–700-hPa layer and moderate wind shear in the 500–200-hPa layer. These characteristics are similar to results reported for MCV development in the central United States.

A Climatology of Midlatitude Mesoscale Convective Vortices in the Rapid Update Cycle

2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (5) ◽  
pp. 1940-1956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric P. James ◽  
Richard H. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle ◽  
Lower Troposphere ◽  
Individual Case ◽  
Relative Vorticity ◽  
Significant Feature ◽  
Composite Analysis ◽  
Mesoscale Convective ◽  
Vortex Detection ◽  
Upper Level ◽  
Convective Vortices

Abstract Climatological characteristics of mesoscale convective vortices (MCVs) occurring in the state of Oklahoma during the late spring and summer of four years are investigated. The MCV cases are selected based on vortex detection by an objective algorithm operating on analyses from the Rapid Update Cycle (RUC) model. Consistent with a previous study, true MCVs represent only about 20% of the mesoscale relative vorticity maxima detected by the algorithm. The MCVs have a broad range of radii and intensities, and their longevities range between 1 and 54 h. Their median radius is about 200 km, and their median midlevel relative vorticity is 1.2 × 10−4 s−1. There appears to be no significant relationship between MCV longevity and intensity. Similar to past estimates, approximately 40% of the MCVs generate secondary convection within their circulations. The mean synoptic-scale MCV environment is determined by the use of a RUC-based composite analysis at four different stages in the MCV life cycle, defined based on vortex detection by the objective algorithm. MCV initiation is closely tied to the diurnal cycle of convection over the Great Plains, with MCVs typically forming in the early morning, near the time of maximum extent of nocturnal mesoscale convective systems (MCSs). Features related to the parent MCSs, including upper-level divergent outflow, midlevel convergence, and a low-level jet, are prominent in the initiating MCV composite. The most significant feature later in the MCV life cycle is a persistent mesoscale trough in the midlevel height field. The potential vorticity (PV) structure of the composite MCV consists of a midlevel maximum and an upper-level minimum, with some extension of elevated PV into the lower troposphere as the vortex matures. The environment immediately downshear of the MCV is more conducive to secondary convection than the environment upshear of the MCV. This midlatitude MCV climatology represents an extension of past individual case studies by providing mean characteristics of a large MCV population; these statistics are suitable for the verification of MCV simulations. Also presented is the first high-resolution composite analysis of the MCV environment at different stages of the MCV life cycle, which will aid in identifying and forecasting these systems.

scholarly journals A Phase-Plot Method for Diagnosing Vorticity Concentration Mechanisms in Mesoscale Convective Vortices

2007 ◽  
Vol 135 (3) ◽  
pp. 801-820 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Kirk
Keyword(s):  
Lower Troposphere ◽  
Vertical Motion ◽  
Alternative Form ◽  
Middle Region ◽  
Phase Plot ◽  
Mesoscale Convective ◽  
Evolutionary Growth ◽  
Evolutionary Paths ◽  
Mesoscale Convective Vortex ◽  
Convective Vortices

Abstract Mesoscale convective vortex (MCV) analysis results show that these vortices form by way of different evolutionary paths. Rewriting the traditional form of the relative vertical vorticity equation in terms of momentum advection curl produces an alternative form of the equation containing two terms. When the terms are normalized and plotted on orthogonal axes, a phase-plot path depicting MCV evolutionary growth is created. Thermodynamics is included in the phase plot by correlating the path to the heating characteristics of the troposphere. The application of the phase-plot scheme to several cases shows that for MCV formation events, there are two interconnected regions that combine to produce the vortex. The upper-middle- and upper-troposphere vorticity growth is governed primarily by vertical motion, with heating driving the vorticity growth in the upper-middle region. The lower-middle and lower-troposphere vorticity growth is governed primarily by horizontal motion, with the vertical heating gradient driving the vorticity growth in the lower-middle region. Which regime leads the vorticity growth is found to be case dependent. In the middle troposphere, evolutionary paths are governed by the relative strengths of heating and heating gradient. Additional phase-plot and mesoscale analyses clarify the characteristics of two MCV formation modes. In some cases, heating drives the complete formation of the MCV, whereas in cases with lesser heating, tipping is vital to the MCV formation process. In total, these results help synthesize many of the various discoveries regarding the origin and formation of the MCV.

scholarly journals Evaluating Precursor Signals for QLCS Tornado and Higher Impact Straight-Line Wind Events

2021 ◽  
pp. 62-75
Author(s):  
Justin G. Gibbs
Keyword(s):  
Lead Times ◽  
Convective Systems ◽  
Significant Challenge ◽  
Straight Line ◽  
Mesoscale Convective ◽  
Supercell Storms ◽  
Tornado Warning ◽  
Wind Events ◽  
Convective Vortices ◽  
Moderate Positive Correlation

Tornadoes produced by quasi-linear convective systems (QLCS) present a significant challenge to National Weather Service warning operations. Given the speed and scale at which they develop, different methods for tornado warning decision making are required than what traditionally are used for supercell storms. This study evaluates the skill of one of those techniques—the so-called three-ingredients method—and produces new approaches. The three-ingredients method is found to be reasonably skillful at short lead times, particularly for systems that are clearly linear. From the concepts and science of the three-ingredients method, several new combinations of environmental and radar parameters emerge that appear slightly more skillful, and may prove easier to execute in real time. Similar skill between the emerging methods provides the forecaster with options for what might work best in any given scenario. A moderate positive correlation with overall wind speed with some radar and environmental variables also is identified. Additionally, mesoscale convective vortices and supercell-like features in QLCS are found to produce tornadoes at a much higher rate than purely linear systems.

Patterns of Precipitation and Mesolow Evolution in Midlatitude Mesoscale Convective Vortices

2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (3) ◽  
pp. 909-931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric P. James ◽  
Richard H. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Surface Pressure ◽  
Pressure Effects ◽  
Cold Pool ◽  
Tropical Cyclogenesis ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
Convective Systems ◽  
Stratiform Region ◽  
Mesoscale Convective ◽  
Convective Vortices

Abstract Surface pressure manifestations of mesoscale convective vortices (MCVs) that traversed Oklahoma during the periods May–August 2002–05 are studied using the Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D), the Oklahoma Mesonet, and the NOAA Profiler Network data. Forty-five MCVs that developed from mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) have been investigated, 28 (62%) of which exhibit mesolows detectable at the surface. Within this group, three distinct patterns of precipitation organization and associated mesolow evolution have been identified. The remaining 17 (38%) of the cases do not contain a surface mesolow. Two repeating patterns of precipitation organization are identified for the latter group. The three categories of MCVs possessing a surface mesolow are as follows. Nineteen are classified as “rear-inflow-jet MCVs,” and tend to form within large and intense asymmetric MCSs. Rear inflow into the MCS, enhanced by the development of an MCV on the left-hand side relative to system motion, produces a rear-inflow notch and a distinct surface wake low at the back edge of the stratiform region. Hence, the surface mesolow and MCV are displaced from one another. Eight are classified as “collapsing-stratiform-region MCVs.” These MCVs arise from small asymmetric MCSs. As the stratiform region of the MCS weakens, a large mesolow appears beneath its dissipating remnants due to broad subsidence warming, and at the same time the midlevel vortex spins up due to column stretching. One case, called a “vertically coherent MCV,” contains a well-defined surface mesolow and associated cyclonic circulation, apparently due to the strength of the midlevel warm core and the weakness of the low-level cold pool. In these latter two cases, the surface mesolow and MCV are approximately collocated. Within the group of MCVs without a surface mesolow, 14 are classified as “remnant-circulation MCVs” containing no significant precipitation or surface pressure effects. Finally, three are classified as “cold-pool-dominated MCVs;” these cases contain significant precipitation but no discernible surface mesolow. This study represents the first systematic analysis of the surface mesolows associated with MCVs. The pattern of surface pressure and winds accompanying MCVs can affect subsequent convective development in such systems. Extension of the findings herein to tropical oceans may have implications regarding tropical cyclogenesis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document